An Administration’s Approach

In the context of U.S. history, Franklin D. Roosevelt aimed to expand the federal government’s role during the Great Depression, while current President Donald Trump’s approach involves reducing that role through unilateral executive actions, as noted by political analyst Bendavid.

Critiques and Protests

As nationwide protests were organized to mark the first 100 days of Trump’s presidency, critics highlighted how his policies potentially exacerbate the difficulties faced by the working class. They pointed to measures such as layoffs of federal employees, funding cuts, aggressive deportations, and tariffs that may harm the economy.

“The cruelty is unnerving, the disregard for the Constitution and rule of law is reckless, and the day-to-day pain can never be justified.”

Economic Consequences

A memo from watchdog group Accountable.US emphasized the link between a fair economy and democracy, asserting that Trump’s first days in office have negatively affected both. Potentially disastrous actions are reportedly creating chaos and uncertainty for small businesses and workers’ rights, causing a significant drop in consumer confidence, as illustrated by the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index, which fell to its lowest level since early in the pandemic.

Worker Impact

According to the Economic Policy Institute, Trump’s administration has taken numerous steps that adversely affect workers, including cuts to funding aimed at combating child labor. Unions have denounced the administration for broken promises during the campaign, highlighting the disparity between Trump’s rhetoric and actions affecting working people and labor rights.

“Instead, the first 100 days of this billionaire-run administration have been fueled by lies, broken promises, and a relentless assault on working people and unions.”

Attacks on Vulnerable Groups

Trump’s administration has faced accusations of direct harm to children, with First Focus on Children highlighting extensive plans that would cut essential healthcare and educational funding. Advocates warn that recent actions have disproportionately affected marginalized communities, laying bare the negative implications of current policies.

Responses and Legal Challenges

In response to perceived overreach, various advocacy groups and unions have pursued legal challenges against the Trump administration’s measures. The ACLU reported multiple lawsuits aimed at defending citizens’ rights against what they characterize as systematic erosion of democratic principles and human rights.

Calls for Action

Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich urged a collective response to mobilize against a perceived threat to democracy, emphasizing the urgency of organized opposition to Trump’s actions. Meanwhile, Congressional efforts, including new articles of impeachment, are emerging as public discontent grows regarding the administration’s trajectory.

“The president is not a king, and Congress is meant to be a co-equal branch of government. We can’t afford to wait another 100 days for them to finally remember that.”

Conclusion

As the first 100 days conclude, a considerable portion of the American public expresses discontent with the administration’s policies. Activism is ramping up, with upcoming rallies planned to advocate for workers’ rights and to oppose Trump’s agenda.