In a collective action, over 40 organizations have formally rejected recent proposals from the Trump administration aimed at dismantling the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This coalition has reached out to Congress, urging them to stand firm in support of FEMA, which plays a critical role in assisting state, local, tribal, and territorial governments before and following disasters.

Background on the Proposed Changes

The coalition’s letter was a direct response to statements made by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who declared intentions to “eliminate FEMA.” This aligns with President Trump’s earlier comments during a visit to disaster-stricken areas in North Carolina and California, where he suggested FEMA might be abolished altogether.

FEMA’s Historical Role

Established in 1979, FEMA originally functioned as an independent agency until it was integrated into the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2003. Under the Trump administration’s direction, Noem and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth lead a council tasked with reviewing FEMA operations, with recommendations expected by late July. Concurrently, the administration has initiated staff terminations as part of broader federal government cutbacks.

The Coalition’s Concerns

The diverse array of organizations—including those focused on climate change, consumer advocacy, disaster recovery, and environmental justice—have voiced apprehension about the ramifications of transferring disaster preparedness responsibilities to under-resourced state and local entities. They assert that the ongoing impacts of climate change necessitate federal support, especially in light of increased frequency and severity of extreme weather events.

The Current Climate Crisis

Recent disasters underscore the urgent need for a robust FEMA. In 2022, the United States faced 27 weather-related catastrophes each resulting in losses exceeding $1 billion. Reports suggest that these figures are likely to escalate as policies continue to support the fossil fuel sector. The hurricane Helene alone inflicted $78.7 billion in damages, particularly devastating regions in North Carolina.

Impact on Local Communities

North Carolina’s Governor, Josh Stein, expressed his discontent with FEMA’s refusal to extend its 100% reimbursement period following the recent disasters. He highlighted that the needs of affected families are immense, calling for essential recovery support to help them rebuild their lives.

The Coalition’s Call to Action

The organizations emphasize that relinquishing disaster recovery responsibilities to individual states poses a significant risk, particularly for smaller or frequently impacted states. They argue that FEMA’s support is essential for the restoration of infrastructure and provision of immediate relief services in the aftermath of severe disasters.

“FEMA plays a vital role in stepping in to support state and local governments when hurricanes, wildfires, and floods overwhelm them,” the coalition stated.

Importance of FEMA’s Programs

A focal point of the coalition’s advocacy is FEMA’s Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program, which aims to bolster infrastructure against disaster impacts. Additionally, the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) serves as a critical flood insurance option for homeowners in vulnerable areas.

Conclusion: A Critical Moment for FEMA

The coalition concludes that the current moment is pivotal for Congress to rebuff unwarranted cuts to FEMA. “Dismantling federal emergency preparedness programs is a direct threat to the safety, stability, and recovery of millions of Americans,” they cautioned.