The Trump administration announced on [date of the announcement], the decision to revoke Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for over 14,600 Afghan and 7,900 Cameroonian immigrants residing in the United States. This change raises concerns among advocates highlighting that, despite the administration’s stance, the conditions in both countries remain perilous for returnees.

Understanding Temporary Protected Status (TPS)

TPS is a humanitarian designation allowing individuals from countries experiencing significant turmoil—such as armed conflict or natural disasters—to remain in the U.S. and work legally. Many of those affected by the recent revocation will face possible deportation by May and June, respectively.

Background on Cameroon and Afghanistan

The TPS status for Cameroonians was originally granted in response to a civil conflict that began in 2017, which has created widespread violence and economic collapse within the country. Nearly 1 million people have been internally displaced, and over 1.8 million are in urgent need of humanitarian assistance.

In Afghanistan, the situation remains critical under Taliban governance. The country’s human rights record has deteriorated significantly, particularly concerning women and girls, who face severe restrictions on their freedoms and increased risks of violence.

Reactions from Advocates and Community Leaders

Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of Global Refuge, expressed deep concern regarding the decision, stating, “TPS exists for a reason: to protect people whose return to their country would place them in grave danger.” Vignarajah emphasized that conditions in Afghanistan continue to be dire, making the termination of TPS a morally questionable move.

Amos, a Cameroonian TPS holder and CASA member, shared, “With the protection of TPS, I have been able to build a stable life in the U.S., contribute meaningfully to my community, and pursue a future full of promise.” He added that losing TPS would jeopardize their safety and stability.

Gustavo Torres, executive director of CASA, remarked on the implications of deportation, suggesting that it could be interpreted as a “xenophobic attack” that places affected individuals and their families at continued risk.

Legal and Humanitarian Implications

The decision to rescind TPS is being scrutinized, as legal experts believe it may not survive judicial review. A federal judge has previously blocked similar moves regarding TPS for Venezuelans, citing unconstitutional motives behind the decisions. Attorney Ahilan Arulanantham noted that legal challenges will focus on whether the U.S. government complied with the TPS statute regarding the safety of returning nationals to their home countries.